Beat-Sonic ENA-2T3 vs ENA-3T3 Amplifier

Jami Rodriguez

While both of these support a wide variety of modern Toyota vehicles like your 2024+ Land Cruiser / Tacoma / 2025+ 4Runner, please read on.

Purchase the ENA-2T3 here.
Purchase the ENA-3T3 here.

🔊 What are these amps?

Both ENA-2T3 and ENA-3T3 belong to Beat-Sonic’s “Encore Alpha” line — compact, plug-and-play amplifiers designed to upgrade a vehicle’s factory sound system without needing to replace the head unit or speakers. 

Their common goals: improve clarity, increase volume and bass, and deliver a richer, fuller audio experience while retaining OEM integration (controls, wiring harness, etc.). 


⚙️ Key Specifications Compared

Spec / Feature ENA-2T3 ENA-3T3
Power Output 45 W × 4ch (4 Ω) 50 W × 4ch (4 Ω) 
Speaker Impedance 4–8 Ω  4–8 Ω
Frequency Response 15–80 kHz (+0/–1 dB)  15–80 kHz (+0/–1 dB) 
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) 0.01% (1 kHz / 4 Ω)  0.01% (1 kHz / 4 Ω) 
Inputs RCA (line-level) + high-level speaker inputs  Still supports high-level inputs; plus RCA outputs (see below) 
Outputs 4 × speaker outputs  4 × speaker outputs, 2 × RCA line-level outputs — for subwoofer or additional amp integration. 
Physical Size / Weight 96 mm × ~114 mm × 40 mm; ~420 g  Same size and weight as ENA-2T3 
Amplifier Class Class AB Class AB 

🎯 Where Each Amplifier Excels

✅ When to choose ENA-2T3

  • You just want a straightforward, noticeable upgrade to your factory sound without altering the system — more clarity, better dynamics, stronger bass and volume — and you don’t plan to add a subwoofer or additional amp. Many users report that ENA-2T3 “installs in minutes” and drastically improves sound quality, even on modest speaker setups. 

  • If you are using a factory system (even JBL-equipped ones), and want minimal risk and minimal complexity. 

  • It’s often promoted as the “safe bet” for those who want a clean, factory-friendly audio boost without extra gear.

✅ When to choose ENA-3T3

  • You want more power — ENA-3T3 delivers a slight bump (50 W vs 45 W) which can translate into cleaner sound at higher volumes, or better overall headroom. 

  • You plan to expand your audio system later — maybe add a subwoofer or an external amp. The built-in RCA outputs (line-level) make that possible without needing external converters or complicated wiring.

  • You want flexibility and future-proofing. Even if you don’t add extra gear immediately, having the subwoofer outputs gives you that option later.


🔍 Real-World Considerations & Community Feedback

  • For users just wanting to “wake up” the factory system and make music sound more dynamic, ENA-2T3 often does the job — many describe the difference as “clearer vocals, more defined bass, richer mids and highs” with minimal installation effort. 
  • If you foresee adding a subwoofer or intend to keep the system for a long time, ENA-3T3’s extra features and flexibility tend to make it more “future-proof,” even if the immediate difference (compared to ENA-2T3) is modest. 


🧩 Verdict: Which Amp for Which Use-Case

  • Use ENA-2T3 if you want a simple, reliable, plug-and-play audio boost — a “set it and forget it” upgrade with minimal fuss. Great for everyday driving, moderate audio expectations, and stock speaker systems.

  • Use ENA-3T3 if you want more flexibility, more power, and the ability to expand your system later (e.g. subwoofer or additional amplifier). It’s slightly more capable now — and more adaptable for future upgrades.

If I were advising a friend: if this is their first audio upgrade and they just want a noticeable improvement to the factory stereo — go with ENA-2T3 for simplicity. If they’re thinking long-term, want to tinker or possibly add a subwoofer — ENA-3T3 is worth the (slightly) extra cost.

 

Add a comment

* Comments must be approved before being displayed.